NSFW Filter

kmgagnlkckiamnenbpigfaljmanlbbhh

Free, open source, and privacy-focused browser extension to block "not safe for work" content.

Latest reviews

• (2023-10-17) Ilja Stepanov: Damn nice job you did here, can you make it work on videos ?
• (2023-06-21) Carióceco: It don't work on twitter
• (2023-06-05) Futekina: I tried this filter out by just using the keyword p*rn, and it does block a good amount of the images fairly well, but a lot of pictures get past the filter. If you're trying to block everything, I wouldn't suggest this extension. Also it doesn't censor videos at all, so I would look elsewhere.
• (2023-06-03) Albin Hi: I just wrote porn like in the thumbnail to see if it works and I now need bleach! I have been scarred for my life.
• (2023-06-03) john es: It's nice. I use this extension and vRate at the same time to cover the most range. Feature suggestion: this should also work on mobile on the Kiwi browser.
• (2023-03-23) Oliver Goodman: It screws with Etsy product pages, it shows the images on the right side of the page, covering all the details on the listing.
• (2023-03-19) RealRainbowfoxes: I love it as it censors all my stuff as I'm already caged up and feeling horny as my mistress told me to get it and I obeyed her as I've now got parent lock and censored content on my devices now. Just wish it censored discord pics as well but hopefully see that in future <3
• (2023-01-08) zombie machines: awesome extension!!!
• (2022-07-30) Noor Aldeen: I have found several add-ons with the same feature, but I think it is the best of them. I hope more development for this add-on _ and thank you very much for this add-on and for this excellent work: Positives : The add-on is completely free _Artificial intelligence in blocking photos _ speed in blocking _Ability to adjust the strength of the ban _ Respect for the privacy that the add-on enjoys, as the developer mentioned (knowing that the extension displays the banned number, I don't know if this number is sent to developers) Negatives : _ Videos are not supported, and here I do not mean the thumbnails of the video, but the video itself _When photos are blocked if you use mouse hover extension for photos the photos are displayed Characteristics that I think should be included in the extension: _ Show a button that temporarily unblocks the selected image when there are false positives _Increasing the detection power, that is, making 100% more effective
• (2022-05-05) Cristian Silvestre: Honestly, it really does work, very well. No other filters compare fairly. It doesnt block every single picture but it really blocks so much more than other filters, anyway. I'm sure with this, i dont have to worry about inappropriate surprises. Thanks for this!
• (2022-04-30) Lyle: Best extension on the store
• (2021-10-27) science blossom: Misses so many images. There must be an option for making the nudity detection stronger (way stronger, it almost filters 20 percent of the explicit results, Maybe).
• (2021-09-28) Matthias S: Working very well so far but there are a lot of false positives being hidden. Could also be because of the 100% strictness but I want to make sure to remove/hide as much as possible. I've also noticed some visual glitches when having more than one browser instance open with one playing a twitch-livestream but nothing major. (I'm using Chrome) I hope there will be more tweaks/updates in the future to make it more accurate with better trained AI.
• (2021-06-26) Mahdi Hasan: Nothing works as I expect. It blocks many images as false-positive and also can't block many images containing full nudity.
• (2021-06-20) bill “Bill” YA: thxs ,very good
• (2021-04-26) Nukl33r: it did filter most of the nsfw images but it didn't block all even when I turned the extension's filter strictness to max
• (2021-03-27) Generic Schlub: Okish, doesn't particularly work. It blocks "live action" NSFW content well enough, but the AI has a hard time detecting animated/cartoony NSFW content. Until that gets fixed, I think I'll go with a different blocker extension.
• (2021-03-19) RITHIK ALIAS: Ohhh!!! great work @Navendu
• (2021-01-26) Vitalii Kuzin: If it hides 10 images, 5 are SFW male faces, 4 are SFW female faces, and 1 can be correct work. I think you should correct the AI engine.
• (2021-01-11) CAWED DAN: It did filtered some NSFW, but not all.
• (2020-12-29) чуля: idk which websites it's supposed to work on but i've literally searched the images tagged as porn (on a non-google search engine) to check if it works and apparantely it doesn't
• (2020-12-09) Ayush Kumar: Doesn't work
• (2020-12-08) Allister T: doesnt block reddit nsfw
• (2020-11-05) Sohil Ellabban: This is helping me a lot thank you bro for making this
• (2020-11-01) Anson Lau: So far very good. However, I have a question. 100 is the highest filter strictness right? Or is it the lowest strictness?
• (2020-10-21) Ryan S: Nice
• (2020-10-02) tob: Yeah it's great from now :D
• (2020-09-04) Rodrigo Nascimento: great
• (2020-09-02) Navendu Pottekkat: Really awesome! Works really well
• (2020-09-02) Yegor Zaremba: I'm developer of this extension, obviously, its awesome :D
• (2020-08-31) Hoàng Cao: Nice application. Sometimes it blocks non-NSFW images but overall okay. Thank the team for the extension!
• (2020-08-25) axilirate: Not perfect, but does the work.
• (2020-08-24) Abdulkadir: it should check recursive images, such as in facebook comments threads. it seemed like it didn't work on the image thumb till I opened it, would be better if it can classify even the thumbnails. and it has some issues with reshowing the images sometimes, ps. facebook pfps (sfw ones). other than that, I can't be grateful enough.