Hearts

iiekbobmockobialdpkcikfbldlinhch

Enjoy the best Hearts Card Game around with 4 difficulties!

Latest reviews

• (2018-11-24) larry davis: too easy even on the hardest the other players play exactly the same every game
• (2018-11-23) Mark Kennedy: I seem to win 9 times out of 10 and when I lose I usually run second. Expert needs to be made harder,
• (2018-11-18) Dave Wilson: i keep finding a big glitch that crashes the game, when the player on the left leads and i am watching tv at same time i keep hitting button on mouse and it lets me put 2 cards on 1 trick... also the expert level is no expert - they make it difficult to moon by throwing low hearts every time but it makes it easy when you know 2 or 3 low hearts are coming on every pass. whoever designed this is not an expert player... here is a hint to improve.. instead of passing 3 low hearts try passing only 1 low heart and make sure you take it when it is played.
• (2018-11-17) David Dunbar: ditto. "expert" way easy
• (2018-11-17) Jean Toomey: There needs to be much harder games - too easy to win!
• (2018-11-16) William Wallace: Love to play the game but it is sooo easy. I win 99 out of 100 times.
• (2018-11-16) Delores Simone: need to step up the pace,i ran 3 out of 4 hands,and i do not think i am that good , TOM from NY
• (2018-11-13) Ron Young: Card play useless But iyt is free
• (2018-11-13) Love the game!!!!
• (2018-11-12) Henry Simpson: I have a better chance in Vegas and Atlantic City of having a "ZERO". However one reprieve for the lotteries are just "ONE" ticket will increase your chances tremendously! Keep on playing Klondike games!
• (2018-11-06) Kai Jprgensen: Very poor setup no t ver interesting
• (2018-11-03) James Whitmore: Game is too easy. Read some of the reviews and game being too easy is the No. 1 complaint. I guess 247Hearts isn't gonna do anything about as some complaints are over two yrs old. Computer players sometimes play Queen of Spades for no reason and lose game.
• (2018-11-01) Jane Box: GREAT FOR BEGINNERS Expert level is too easy and it's very slow pace. Still fun
• (2018-11-01) Steve Tee: Good action. Lively opponents.
• (2018-10-29) John Narvali: This is probably the worst version of the games I've ever played! Sorry. It has some redeeming qualities but you either need to make it much more difficult or start all over again.
• (2018-10-26) Peg Leg: I agree with George. First time I played it I got control twice when I shouldn't have. Ended up with zero score and a win. Not worth playing against.
• (2018-10-24) Bill Baisden: I play most of your games and really enjoy each one.
• (2018-10-20) Bob-Jan Brownlee: Not challenging, and no J of diamonds option.
• (2018-10-20) Alan Ringgold: Your software is disappointing. The same tactics every time by the AI players. I agree that any 8 year old would be more of a challenge.
• (2018-10-19) Not what I expected in a hearts game, you can't get points for the jack of Diamond. Can't seem to find another hearts so it will do.
• (2018-10-17) Gary Slater: I beat it 95% of the time, easily. Who wrote this code? Don't hire him!
• (2018-10-15) Lillie Neville: You keep adding the 26 points to my score. Why? Do you think I am cheating? You sure are!
• (2018-10-14) The Queen of Spades is strangely played in this game - and when the program takes them all.
• (2018-10-10) Patrick E. Craig: The game has locked in and whatever level I choose I can't get a new game, just a resumed game. Fix it please.
• (2018-10-06) Angelia Lee: why I shoot the moon but it did not subtract 26 from my score.
• (2018-10-06) Donald A Ahern: It's easy to criticise about particular aspects of the setup of a game; but consider building one yourself. The purpose of any game is to win. Once you know "the rules" it's a doddle. It is also fun! Plus you get different stages to test your skills. So enjoy the game for what it's worth, not what you think it should be.
• (2018-10-01) Bob Harris: Repeatedly get the exact same hands a couple of times in one game. The program that randomly shuffles the cards does not work. I can play game to 100 then play again and get the same hands and the other hands are played the same by the computer. I play at the expert level and have figured out how to beat it every hand because it repeats everything.
• (2018-09-29) Kelly Cosper: sometimes when you take a trick and go to throw yur next card it takes it
• (2018-09-29) Way way WAY too easy.
• (2018-09-29) Wendy Bevan: very poor program lose interest in a short time, avoid
• (2018-09-27) Clive Pitcher: The rule for hearts includes the diamond 10 which, if captured, counts 10 plus (a reducion of points against) . Another rule is that the spade Queen cannot be passed. The suggestions make little sense, for example, it makes no sense to play low cards first, especially in spades (ex King, Ace).
• (2018-09-18) RJ O: The computer philosophy of NEVER trying to win a hand is not realistic, The other players very often end up with high cards even when they had the chance to win a hand earlier on in the game. Since you can not get a heart or the queen on the hand, winning that trick is fine. Usually all the spades on that first trick are a 6 or lower.
• (2018-09-13) Jacqueline Hunter: Loved it went for the hard and managed. love the game. really fun. I am just learning and this is really helpful.
• (2018-09-13) An opponent played the queen of spades, but on the next trick he played the king of spades. His partner played the king of hearts to take a trick and then played the six of hearts which would have prevented him from taking the trick before. This is expert level??????????????? Did the programmer even know how to play Hearts? Yes its free and you get what you pay for, but if you're going to put it out there at least it should play correctly.
• (2018-09-13) Carl Murray: A good hearts game, but too easy to shoot the moon.
• (2018-09-07) Buster Frederick: I agree with George the play at the expert level should be coincise with the knowledge of an expert
• (2018-09-05) Gary Bean: Love playing hearts
• (2018-09-02) Peter Henning: Love it
• (2018-09-01) Gaylord TOLLEFSON: Well designed, Need haRDER GAMES, BUT LOVE IT
• (2018-08-30) G Oliver Tollefson: love it, thanks
• (2018-08-29) Jamie Morton: I love the game of hearts, it was hard to find this game on the computer for a very long time, and now I got it and will continue to play.
• (2018-08-28) james mc ginley: to easy
• (2018-08-27) Clayton Williams: not the best on the net1
• (2018-08-27) Jack Harwick: No challenge!
• (2018-08-27) Terry Warren: Two days and can't lose a game? Makes it pointless to play. Oh yeah, that is expert level.
• (2018-08-26) Jerry Thompson: Far to easy to win on the expert level. Not even a challenge.
• (2018-08-24) Rich Newman: Easy level play was ridiculous. A 7 year old would play smarter.
• (2018-08-22) John Shorter: Some of us lack the 'smarts' of these folks who get perfect results everytime. You can please some of the people some of the time, but you will never please all of the people all of the time
• (2018-08-20) Bob Streimikes: weak play
• (2018-08-19) David Bibler: fast and accurate