CRX id
jmnpibhfpmpfjhhkmpadlbgjnbhpjgnd
jmnpibhfpmpfjhhkmpadlbgjnbhpjgnd
Description from extension meta
Protect against online threats in real-time using multiple browser protection engines.
Image from store
Description from store
Osprey：浏览器防护扩展旨在确保您的浏览安全，防止钓鱼和恶意网站的威胁。通过使用来自行业领先威胁情报提供商的先进防护服务，Osprey 会检查您访问的每一个网址，以检测并拦截恶意软件、钓鱼、欺诈及其他在线威胁。借助可自定义的设置，您可以根据需要调整扩展，确保抵御威胁，甚至还能过滤成人内容。
主要功能：
- 多层防护，应对各种在线威胁
- 实时检测，依托可信赖的安全服务提供商
- 不安全网站警报与被拦截内容提示
- 尊重隐私：不收集数据，不进行跟踪
您的安全至关重要，Osprey 为您的每一次上网带来安心。
Latest reviews
- (2025-08-01) mini moon: please add scam minder, scam adviser, gridinsoft, & fortiguard.. thanks..
- (2025-06-11) Squishy: Never get phished again. Period. I added this to my grandmas computer.
- (2025-04-24) Николай Кацыгин: Interesting extension.
- (2025-04-15) Len Fox: Because this extension only passes the minimum information to the engine it uses to check the URL your are visiting, it provides better privacy than using browser extensions of the listed engines separately (using their own browsing extension). Upside of this extension that the delay is minimal (strangely it scored better in performance tests than for instance Bitdefender Traffic light), so besides offering broader protection and better privacy it also provides great performance. NOTE: (for what it is worth): I like a "less is more" approach. Because Valkyrie and TotalAV did not do much and Emsisoft and GDATA both use Bitdefender with their own engines, therefor I opted for Microsoft Smartscreen, Norton and Bitdefender. EDIT: after the update to version 1.07, I noticed that the newly added Symantec Browser Protection blocked 70%, Bitdefender 25% and Norton 5% when enabling all engines. This is partly explained by the sequence in which the API's are called (same order as the extension's enable/disable popup). When taking a look in the browser console, I also noticed a pattern in "safe website" results in which Symantec, Bitdefender and Norton usually responded within 10 millisecs and Microsoft and Emsisoft usually took over 200 ms to respond and Total and Gdata showed mixed results (sometimes <10 and sometimes > 200ms). UPDATE (for what it is worth): I now have enabled only Symantec, Bitdefender and Norton webprotections for best balance between detection and fastest 'safe website' results. Thanks for this great all-in-one webprotection extension!
- (2025-02-11) Bayu 10: i think it will be much more better if you would like to add : 1) mcafee web advisor & malwarebytes browser guard engines 2) low trust from total webshield because your total webshield only based on malicious database please consider to add the features.. thank you..
- (2024-10-29) Abby L: This extension is wonderful!! I can have peace of mind knowing it keeps mine and my family's browsing safe and secure without slowing down any loading times. Thank you Osprey!