Do Browser: AI Browser Agent

hjcibkpfgnljonndnnanhkholafmgmip

A browser extension that follows your commands.

Latest reviews

• (2025-02-26) Mohammed Yasir: Its not free :(
• (2025-02-16) James Ray “JR” Elliott: Holy CHIT!!! You guys have it figured out! Man if y'all can, don't let the big boys have this one. I'm pulling for you guys! I don't understand how you could rate this any less than 5 stars. Oh yes I do... haters! lol
• (2025-02-15) Jason Pawloski: I have been testing and using DO Browser for around a month and 1/2. I have to say the concept is brillant and others ai creators have taken notice. The only complaint I have is in the speed of the tasks. It seems to think for a long bit of time or at least in my experience with it. So that would be the only improvement from my standpoint. I am giving 3 stars not to shame but to say there is room for improvement and I am sure Swayer can make it happen.
• (2025-02-14) Anthony Carrasco: I look forward to the future of DO BROWSER. 💜 Hey Sawyer! great job
• (2025-01-31) Erick junior: NOT FREE
• (2025-01-27) Chiranjeet Banerjee: I used it and 80-90% time I only got errors. Could be good for very basic redundant tasks but not worth paying for it. I wud hve loved to give some thumbs up if it was not using my funds to get better at the cost of no value.
• (2025-01-19) eric greenberg: one of if not the most advanced up coming agentic browsers
• (2025-01-16) Vambola Tullus: EDIT: Added my API and saw how much it costs. So I understand developer point now on putting limits. My oled comment: While I like the idea behind Do Browser, it’s not worth $25/month. The daily task limit is far too low for the price, and it feels too restrictive. For the cost, it should offer much more functionality and flexibility. Great concept, but poor execution.
• (2025-01-13) Jay Storm: Game-Changing Browser Automation Experience I used it, I loved it, I will be pushing it to limit!! haha highly recommend, I'm making youtube videos on it so you can follow along if you want!!
• (2025-01-13) Patricio Tapia Arancibia: I had a terrible experience with this service. It failed to follow the exact steps I provided, made far too many mistakes, and kept getting stuck in an infinite loop. On top of that, the daily step limit is completely ridiculous. If you're paying for a plan, the steps should be unlimited—otherwise, what's the point of paying? Once you run out of steps, you're forced to switch back to Basic Mode, which doesn't even work properly. It doesn't search for anything you ask it to. Totally disappointing and not worth the investment.
• (2025-01-12) Karan Nagrale: I tried it. It really does work well. But as the official website suggest it is work in progress.
• (2025-01-10) Nishiki Sano: Did what it promised to do. Still Beta, but it is very promising. It can write emails and make tasks in the browser, and It is not a scam. However it is not a fully functional assistent that can do everything you ask it to do. If you find the right task, I am sure it will perform well, but you have to try it out to see if it will work for you.
• (2025-01-10) bubba bece: this is an amazing tool cant wait for more to come . this will just add to the arsenal of tools. i can get it to create pinterest pins and it can schedule even go to drop down and click on board.them also in tailwind it gets stuck but point is it can do it now in it early stages, i had it go to a item in my amazon storefront and add it to my idea list it went to the drop down clicked on it then clicked on the post to add it to it did it .it does get stuck but that willl all work out . its starting to remember and can refresh my tailwind page without a request and truth is it has to be refreshed alot and it now does it
• (2025-01-09) Jose Luis Martinez: For me is ok to automate basic daily tasks.
• (2025-01-06) Rohit Sharma: Honestly, i think you have done a great job. It must have been a lot of smart , strategic development. However, i am not going to continue for the second month as for now, the tool is only able to do basic browsing and operations easily allowed by most browsers and websites. Many websites block request from a bot and sometimes it is unable to take action on its "thoughts" for one or the other reason. If you utilise the money gathered to add a few more partners and solve these problems, make incremental upgrades and improvements, this could be a big success or some corporate may buy you out. Think about it. Let me know if you need help! P.S: You should allow a 10 day trial on 10$ or something, as it is not yet as robust as it should be. It won't pain the payer much, if they don't like it. Cheers!!
• (2025-01-05) Alexandr Medvedev: I am an ML developer myself and for last 2 years was building similar systems, and know that putting together product like this one can be challenging, but I have high hopes that it will work out. I had an embarrassing experience when I tried to order food on delivery in front of my team of developers. Ordering on amazon also didn't work well. However, I was pleased how it managed conversation with other support bot so I can reach a human. Still 5 stars since I see a great potential in this product. Feel free to reach out for whatever is needed at sasha dot medvedev at gmail dot com. One ask from me is to add support of antropic API keys as I would be eager to test it out with latest version of Claude.
• (2025-01-03) Paul Kowalski: It is faster and more accurate than I am when doing the same tasks. Its amazing when it comes to doing real world work.
• (2024-12-30) Erdenay Kokden: It's not ready for primetime. Folks are complaining that they had to pay to try this tool yes if you went to the website and signed up for access, you paid for early access and helping the developer. A 30min trial would really solve this for the creator but you can never satisfy a cheap person so do they really matter? I'm glad I was able to give it a test run and see that it's not ready for what I want it to do specifically replying to comments on my social media profiles. I'm also glad to support a creator that is actively trying to create a really interesting tool. AI isn't free and it definitely isn't cheap. Wishing to see this get better and better over 2025!
• (2024-12-29) Nitish Shrivastava: I appreciate that the tool handles basic tasks decently, but when it comes to advanced functionality, it falls short. There should definitely be a 1- or 2-day trial period to test out the premium features before committing. After just 30 minutes of use, I had already used up 169 premium steps with no meaningful results. The tasks kept looping in the same steps without completing or moving forward. I understand the hard work that goes into developing a tool like this, but from a user perspective, it feels like a waste of money. I hope they consider offering refunds for situations like this, especially if you cancel with an hour after realizing it doesn’t meet your expectations. Overall, a disappointing experience.
• (2024-12-23) Roc Mir: I find it abusive that they require me to signup, and then to pay. Why did they not inform me about the required payment before signing up? I will not pay unless i'm able to test it first under a trial period or preferably under a fremium version. 1 star until a freemium version is launched.
• (2024-12-20) M Amine HAJJI (A): So disappointed. Doesn't work properly. Or I should say it doesn't work at all.
• (2024-12-19) Christopher Kokoski: An Ai agent for your browser that actually works. It's being updated constantly, there is an active Discord community, and -- most importantly - you can ask it to do so many cool things already. Note: It's in Beta and will not magically do everything for you. It's not cheap and there are bugs and kinks in the code that will block you from doing some things you may want to do. However, if you need task and browser automation on your browser, it's worth checking out. I am very impressed with it as is and look forward to seeing how it grows into a robust AI assistant for all kinds of automation.
• (2024-12-18) Gnawl Edge: I watched a video by theAIsearch on YouTube and had to try it out. It's a very clever product with a lot of potential. It was able to complete common practical tasks pretty well, however it was the odd tasks I found myself getting the most enjoyment from it. Reach out if you're looking to new people. Update: Did some prompt engineering with ChatGPT, and now Do Browser can start, answer, and complete surveys on FreeCash.
• (2024-12-15) A Rezaee: Greetings from Germany. Works perfectly for me. Keep up the good work Sawyer!
• (2024-12-14) Johnny Delphi: Far from perfect and needs a bit of prompt engineering to get working, but there is truly no other tool like it.
• (2024-12-14) Biyole Daraje: stay away from this!
• (2024-12-13) Millennium Values: This extension is a game changer. It's conversational, and when you use detailed prompts, it understands and takes action. I have never used anything quite like it. It is an awesome assistant, and I can't wait to see what else it will do in the future.
• (2024-12-11) stephen calmes: A lot of potential with this. I understand this is a new project and needs a bit of tweaking. Sawyer and his buddies are working hard to make this a great extension. Although, as a student, I think the $25 a month is a lot, the extension has proved a lot of fun to work with. Keep it up!
• (2024-12-10) Dmitry Kotov: didn't do this task "do find 5 articles on product management job automation with AI agents, then open up a new google document and write a one page essay on what the current state of product manager job automation with AI agents looks like"
• (2024-12-10) Jay Jazmines: Does not work. It has a lot of errors. Plus their email doesn't reply. [email protected] Trying chrome but it keeps telling me this error "Error in invocation of debugger.sendCommand(debugger.Debuggee target, string method, optional object commandParams, optional function callback): Error at parameter 'target': Unexpected property: 'sessionId'." Will try other browsers like DIA or ARC, haven't tried them but let's see. Maybe at least their support replies lol.
• (2024-12-09) Joshua ONeill: As of now I can only give this 2 stars as it has a ton of potential; However, in it's current state it's pretty useless. I will change my review as soon as this is a minimum viable product. The asking price is $25 a month to use what is basically a Development Kit in Beta. There's absolutely no way this should cost even close to Claude or GPT. If this were $5 a month I would give this a 4 star review, but $25 is insane.
• (2024-12-09) Tim Tierney: Used it for 5 minutes, already back to leave a 5 star review. This is Amazing
• (2024-12-08) Zubair Zubair: it does not work and does not worth for only browsers we need it for all computer
• (2024-12-07) Fly By: Does not work on Chromium. Side window will not open and typing Do Browser in search does not open the browser. That is a wasted $25.
• (2024-12-06) Trey Leonard: its good but can you add gemini support for the ppl who cant buy openai key
• (2024-12-05) Thariq S: The best AI agent on the market, hands down.
• (2024-12-05) Duc Truong Cong: Error occurred: The extensions gallery cannot be scripted.
• (2024-12-04) Stefano Lacchin: We are further along than I had realised. The best AI agent available at this moment.
• (2024-12-04) Reza Ahmadi: how can I request access?
• (2024-12-02) Yaya Soumah: As of now, the best browser AI agent out there, fast, smart and accurate.
• (2024-11-27) மனோஜ்குமார் பழனிச்சாமி: Promising.