Auto Swiper for Tinder, Bumble and more!

knhjggkkeoamjgogdmmefekofllomhea

Auto Swiper Extension to Swipe Tinder, Bumble, Lovoo, PoF and OkCupid Profiles.

Latest reviews

• (2025-07-13) Joel Karayannis: Works good
• (2025-05-02) Saurabh Patel: It worked good for me but, I wanted to ask what if I use travel mode on bumble and want to swipe endlessly ...lets suppose in Australia sitting in INDIA....but it is swiping left for everyone in Australia as it says too far!! How to resolve this?
• (2025-04-12) Jack Meller: seems to just record your swiping actions... kinda creepy. But on Bumble it instantly stops recording after you swipe and displays the results of your session (number of right swipes = 0) therefore the extension doesn't really do anything not even getting a taste of who you like
• (2025-04-11) A Z: Needs a option to lower total swipes or to automatically detect when swipes have ran out. Now it's getting stuck after running out of swipes.
• (2025-03-22) WHY GO OUTSIDE: Doesnt work for bumble
• (2025-02-17) Shiva Prabhakaran: Keeps asking to "write a review" multiple times throughout the day, even though I have chosen "Ask me later" option. Really irritating.
• (2025-02-11) James Schild: It is very good extension ,i have premium subscription
• (2025-01-06) Will Lahke: not working for bumble
• (2024-11-24) Edgar Kretschmann: Love it. Nor perfect but good lil' bug "too far away 500000 Distance" on tinder please fix thanks
• (2024-11-21) Sunil Samarwal: good
• (2024-09-29) sevin elevin: It needs an update for tinder!! Allow the swiper to change my tinder distance preference up and down by one km to allow tinder to update my stack of people. The swiper also does not swipe in the individual category's of tinder. The swiper only works for explore. I do have basic version 6$ a month very worth it.
• (2024-09-19) Barbel Waldfogel: Doesn't work :(
• (2024-08-30) Iain Small: Does what i need it to do!
• (2024-08-03) Charlie Hutchinson: 100 matches in a week! LOVE THIS APP
• (2024-07-28) Zero Outcome: sick
• (2024-07-01) Charan K: ok
• (2024-06-04) Sam Garou: Swiper is pretty good, there's only 6 issues as of now (order of importance) - Bot does not recognize when it reached the daily amount of right swipes on Tinder, spamming on repeat making it look robotic - When putting the average speed per swipe at 3 seconds or lower on tinder, it keeps performing the "random usage" like watching the photo or scrolling through the information. The result is that it performs lots of actions in a short period of time making the account die faster, when it should just perform left/right swipe or at least conforming to the settings (i don't have random usage activated) - Tinder's swiper's unable to refresh itself when it reaches the cache issue "no more memory". After 200-300 swipes, the tab inevitably dies and the swiper is not able to recognize it. - Tinder's swiper randomly stops, losing the statistics collected up to that moment. It's also unable to restart itself when (for example) proxy connection dies for 5-10 minutes, or anything else happens. - Gets bugged (blocks itself) on Tinder when a member sends you a superlike with a message attached to it - It doesn't have the "auto-boost" or "boost scheduler" function for Tinder, that's already been implemented by multiple competitors for this same product
• (2024-04-21) Ksenia: I actually met someone special within 1 month of paid subscription, and my black list of 100s of words worked :) Just celebrated 6 months together :) Thank you, developers, this was a great idea to make this extension. I guess most people use it to have more matches, I used it to have less, but more relevant. :)
• (2024-03-22) asd lol: The service is overall pretty good and more convenient than its competitors. There's 4 flaws on it that reduce the quality of it: 1) Taxes are not considered on the price. $18 for the ultimate package is actually not the real price, which makes it a little more bitter to pay 2) It's really hard (if not impossible) to downgrade to lower packages. You can fix the problem by creating a new account, but it makes the process time-wasting in an industry where time is probably the most precious currency 3) Tinder bugs pretty often, if kept the tab idle or not visible, it starts speedrunning the likes (increasing exponentially the likelyhood of ban). Bumble on the other side doesn't experience the same issue 4) No AI, and considering the crazy prices of the competitions it would really help having an AI integrated bot at accessible prices
• (2024-03-18) pheAnO01: I have made an account with either [email protected], [email protected] and can't login to use the Pro service. Could you get back to me ASAP, thank you. You can contact me on either of the emails provided. Been charged already;)
• (2024-02-24) Alexander Selkirk: I suspect many of these reviews are fake. I paid for the subscription and my card was charged, but I am still unable to receive the paid package. I emailed support twice with no response. This is a scam software designed to steal your money, and the domain appears to be Chinese so there is no legal accountability
• (2024-02-17) Matthias Paulette: Plus, the customizable settings ensure that it matches my preferences perfectly.
• (2024-02-17) Davies Richie: I can't believe how much time and energy Auto Swiper extension has saved me!
• (2024-02-17) Isreal Mattiu: It's like having a personal assistant for my dating life. Highly recommend!
• (2024-02-17) Ricardo: With its efficient swiping feature, I can effortlessly browse through profiles and discover new connections in no time.
• (2024-02-05) Катерина Баришникова: I recently upgraded to the Pro version of Auto Swiper, and let me tell you, it's been a game-changer in the world of online dating of me. The app's intuitive design and powerful features have taken my matchmaking experience to a whole new level. I can easily find people who truly match my preferences without wasting my time. Super
• (2024-01-31) Guillaume Hachez: Works as expected, stays up to date and regularly adds new features. The developer is on top of their game. I'm glad I got a subscription.
• (2024-01-22) mouss aid: i just tried the free plan, 500 per day and thats good not yet nto pro but looks gooooooood.
• (2024-01-20) Biswarup Banerjee: Really good! But I wish it had a free trail to try out the other features like location spoofing! Works like a charm!
• (2023-11-27) Raphael Ali: Bonjour, super application rien à redire. Deux idées: serait-il possible d'ajouter le nombre de match réalisé lors d'une session de swiping ? Et de garder un historique du nombre de swipes gauche, de swipes droit, de matchs lors d'une session de 100 swiping ? Pour la data analyse ce serait super. Merci à vous.
• (2023-11-19) wyxzptlk: Potentially very useful tool. However, it suffers from some basic problems that make it almost useless. It allows you to "reject" people whose profiles have certain keywords, and "like" others who have different keywords. But you then have people who match NO keywords -- which is common, when people have mostly empty profiles -- and those are "liked" by default. This is because there's no way to, say, only "like" people who match keywords. Furthermore, there's no way to combine or rank the effects of preferred and unwanted keywords when selecting or rejecting a profile. For instance, I might want to "like" someone who matches a keyword, but always "reject" them if they match another keyword. You can't do that here. Why are these things problems? Because in my own use case as an example, I end up spending far more time weeding through the mistakes than I would by swiping through the profiles myself. And when you have a limited number of people you can "like" each day, and most of them are mistakes, this extension ends up being more trouble than it's worth. If these problems were addressed -- and given the very high price point, it's disappointing that such basic problems exist -- then this could be a very valuable tool. Edit 1: Appreciate your response. With respect to your comment about the problem being "quite specific", it comes up every time I try to use this tool. Using the example of OKCupid, which doesn't allow blank profiles (so "no Empty Description" doesn't work), people will put in random words just to allow their profiles to be accepted. Such profiles with very little information -- which basically constitute noise -- often outnumber profiles with actual content. This is not just on OKCupid btw, other sites have the same issue. Instead, your app will "like" all the mostly empty profiles because they match neither of the keyword lists, leaving you with mostly noise. The solution would be to have a whitelist, where ONLY profiles that match certain keywords are liked. For the flip side, you already have a blacklist, which is useful. This leaves you with a situation where a profile might match both whitelist and blacklist. You can have a modal where the user gets to choose if they want to keep or discard those profiles. This way, you don't need to go down the admittedly-complex route of ranking.
• (2023-11-15) Rishav Saha: This was brilliant, very useful to say the least. But now it's paid.
• (2023-11-15) Rishav Saha: This was brilliant, very useful to say the least. But now it's paid.
• (2023-11-12) ANKIT PAL: masterpiece I was coding something else on other hand this software helped me with matches in the other half. would like to see if there's a feature for unlimited likes. as i have a pro subscription of dating apps so it should keep swipping right n times instead of limiting it to 100. Anyways nice work thanks for this.
• (2023-09-18) Thiago: O melhor gratis
• (2023-09-10) Johnny Tung: awesome
• (2023-09-10) Johnny Tung: awesome
• (2023-08-07) Titan: Its ok
• (2023-08-07) Titan: Its ok
• (2023-08-05) Tu Tu: Currently has a huge bug when using on Tinder and Bumble. Crash every 15 minutes. Please fix this
• (2023-07-25) Patrick Rice: Solid! You can use on multiple website if you create new Google chrome instances on seperate Chrome accounts!
• (2023-07-23) Superhost Services, LLC: Fraudulent advertising. Marketing as 'unlimited unwanted words' for the 'pro' plan but they were capped at 50. Contacted developer and showed him screen shots as proof and he just said 'that's wrong, only the 'ultimate' plan gets unlimited unwanted words, and refused to honor what he advertised. Read the other bad reviews. This isn't the first time he's pulled something like this. Dude is scammer.
• (2023-07-23) Superhost Services, LLC: Fraudulent advertising. Marketing as 'unlimited unwanted words' for the 'pro' plan but they were capped at 50. Contacted developer and showed him screen shots as proof and he just said 'that's wrong, only the 'ultimate' plan gets unlimited unwanted words, and refused to honor what he advertised. Read the other bad reviews. This isn't the first time he's pulled something like this. Dude is scammer.
• (2023-06-30) Austin Beck: works good, you should add a random swipe timer tho.... ,makes it less obvious you are auto swipping no one swipes at the exact same rate so its obvious ur a bot
• (2023-06-30) Austin Beck: works good, you should add a random swipe timer tho.... ,makes it less obvious you are auto swipping no one swipes at the exact same rate so its obvious ur a bot
• (2023-06-28) Oliver-Beau du Rivage: is good
• (2023-06-28) Oliver-Beau du Rivage: is good
• (2023-06-14) Connor (The Redline Network): By far the best autoswiper on the market, extremely well priced, updated regularly with constant dev support. Couldnt be happier 5/5
• (2023-06-14) Connor (The Redline Network): By far the best autoswiper on the market, extremely well priced, updated regularly with constant dev support. Couldnt be happier 5/5
• (2023-06-13) Deep Temperance: 13/06/23 not swiping in bumble, can you fix it?