Simple WebSocket Client
Construct custom Web Socket requests and handle responses to directly test your Web Socket services.
Simple WebSocket Client is an extension for Google Chrome to help construct custom Web Socket requests and handle responses to directly test your Web Socket services.
1. Enter the URL for your Web Socket server.
2. Click Open.
3. Input request text, then click Send.
4. The extension show response messages.
Latest reviews
I can test my websocket using swcat and it works fine but with this I get "undefined", useless. Flat out doesn't do the job. It's probably spyware.
I can test my websocket using swcat and it works fine but with this I get "undefined", useless. Flat out doesn't do the job. It's probably spyware.
Very useful tool. Thanks to the author! A suggestion by the way: Hope to change the width of the URL input box to 90% instead of the current 225px. This makes it easier to modify the URL.
Very useful tool. Thanks to the author! A suggestion by the way: Hope to change the width of the URL input box to 90% instead of the current 225px. This makes it easier to modify the URL.
Does not detect when server closes connection...
Does not detect when server closes connection...
It connected but the text sent to the server was in a incorrect encoding. The text was encoded as two byte characters, the receiver buffer had zero bytes after each text byte. The reception of messages worked ok.
very nice goooooooooooooood
Simples e útil. Deixa mais clara a situação da conexão e mantêm um histórico das conexões. Poderia ter uma interface menos arcaica.
1) Text areas were poorly laid out and not usefully configured (e.g., no text wrapping, no ability to have multiple texts to send without awkward copy/paste) 2) Sometimes (around 10-20% of the time) when you click the Send button it shows up as sent (in red text below the button), but Wireshark would show that it hadn't sent a damned byte since the protocol upgrade. THIS WASTED A DAY for me, and will for you, too. Normally one has to TRY to make something worse than useless, but it looks like they succeeded.
Super helpful for testing server code.
Super helpful for testing server code.
Great and easy to use extension
Great and easy to use extension
Simple. Exactly what I was looking for.
Simple. Exactly what I was looking for.
Birader cok güzel tool yazımşssın da biraz arayüze kas allah için ya, valla içim sıkılıyor daralıyorum abi
Easy to use. Nice shot!
Easy to use. Nice shot!
Works ok but not sure why devs insist on using tiny unsizable text boxes when there is plenty of real estate. A button to copy the log to clipboard would be useful.
Works ok but not sure why devs insist on using tiny unsizable text boxes when there is plenty of real estate. A button to copy the log to clipboard would be useful.
Does what it should
Does what it should
No Cookie or other headers supported. Cannot be used for authentication.
No Cookie or other headers supported. Cannot be used for authentication.
Doesnt work properly.
this saved me a load of time testing endpoints. very useful tool for testing local environments and production live site environements
this saved me a load of time testing endpoints. very useful tool for testing local environments and production live site environements
Клиент так себе. - Не обрабатывается ошибка подключение. Если соединение разорвано, то это не как не видно. - Очень маленькое поле для ввода URL. - Не хранит историю url и пакетов
Does the Job!
Does the Job!
Does not support Sec-WebSocket-Protocol header
Does not support Sec-WebSocket-Protocol header
Gets the work done but need a better UI UX
Gets the work done but need a better UI UX
just works....
just works....
Very nice!
Very nice!
It doesn't work !
It doesn't work !
I have 2 complaints: - Why does it need to know my browsing-history - I can't subscribe to any topic
I have 2 complaints: - Why does it need to know my browsing-history - I can't subscribe to any topic
I wasn't able to specify subprotocol.
I wasn't able to specify subprotocol.
Very basic yes, but very useful and dependable.
Very basic yes, but very useful and dependable.
Bad layout.
Bad layout.
Text boxes are too small and the output text box has no horizontal scroll bar, or text wrapping. It also truncates data if its too large which is a pain. Would be much better if it could save history of requests.
