網頁剪貼簿

oegnpmiddfljlloiklpkeelagaeejfai

擷取網頁至本地或後端伺服器供檢索、組織、加註、編輯。

Latest reviews

• (2025-03-03) Gustav Palán: 03.03.2025 The best offline website saver I know. Just configure it and it saves everything or whatever is requested while browsing the browser. Unfortunately, Scrapbook stopped working for me today because of the Chrome browser, so I'm thinking about replacing Chrome with another browser, because Scrapbook is more valuable to me than anyone from Google might think with their obsolescence. I managed to migrate from Firefox to Chrome, going back probably won't be a problem Is there another solution? Thank you very much for the extension, Master of Development.
• (2024-12-05) The Secret: Excellent! You just need to learn how to use it!
• (2024-09-21) Леонид Рысев: Thank you for a GREAT app!!!! A lot of year I could not find the same!
• (2024-08-19) Igor Varfolomeev: A must-have extension. Few years ago, I kept using old Firefox (with NPAPI plugins) before this extension was ported to Chrome and became mature enough (and now maybe I'll have to block Chrome updates that would break Manifest v2 extensions). The web server backend requires some effort to setup (I imagine this could be a bit tricky for those who are not familiar with Python), but it provides a whole new level of flexibility.
• (2024-03-15) najmieh sadat safarabadi: the developer photo!
• (2024-03-02) Vladimir Kiselyov: this functional can use with standart Chrome function, without this extensions
• (2024-01-19) Toyosi Adebola: i can't capture page. it keeps tell me this Fatal error: Failed to download "WebScrapBook/data/20240119134740999/index.html": Unable to download to the folder what can i do
• (2023-06-04) ru ve: I was hoping to save a complete webpage for offline use. I enabled the extension and just tried the default "Capture Page" feature. I got a new dialog box to save every single resource on the page, like every image and css file. What an absurd. The page I wanted to save contained a very simple gallery of thumbnails linked to larger images. The extension saved only the thumbnails, and they were still linking to the large image online. I find this extensions completely useless, and very user unfriendly.
• (2023-03-22) Notnilc: I have very limited programming experience so there might be some dunning kreuger at play here, but this much, much, much, MUCH better than httrack or cyotek webcopy. The documentation is great and all, but I feel like most of it could be made redundant with a simple video tutorial.
• (2023-03-22) Notnilc: I have very limited programming experience so there might be some dunning kreuger at play here, but this much, much, much, MUCH better than httrack or cyotek webcopy. The documentation is great and all, but I feel like most of it could be made redundant with a simple video tutorial.
• (2022-11-07) design Source: 一直显示下载失败，但Firefox是正常的。
• (2022-08-19) 张明浩: 1. 完美剪辑HTML，标注HTML 2. 提供PYTHON的后端——实现一端保存，多端查看（docker-PyWebScrapBook github仓库） 3. 免费，感谢作者用爱发电 插件很棒💖💖💖
• (2021-12-03) Алексей kabelsis: Ужасно! Открывает миллион диалоговый окон сохранения изображений и файлов при сохранении всей страницы
• (2021-11-29) Полат Османов: Очень полезное расширение! Рекомендую
• (2021-10-13) F Y: 不支持修改网页内容
• (2021-06-22) EDEN EDEN: Good!
• (2021-06-22) EDEN EDEN: Good!
• (2021-06-12) Li Su: Agree with Clarence Domesticus Wonderful extension, as a ScrapbookX user for years, I think this extension is able to do almost the same as scrapbookX, and additional features of PyWebScrapBook backend make it more useful. I can stop using the now very very slow old version of firefox eventually. Thanks a lot.
• (2021-06-12) Li Su: Agree with Clarence Domesticus Wonderful extension, as a ScrapbookX user for years, I think this extension is able to do almost the same as scrapbookX, and additional features of PyWebScrapBook backend make it more useful. I can stop using the now very very slow old version of firefox eventually. Thanks a lot.
• (2021-05-28) null_404: 网页批注神器
• (2021-04-18) behrouz 40: don't work
• (2021-04-18) behrouz 40: don't work
• (2021-03-15) Clement Maloney: I am sorry to have to give this promising extension 1 star, however I have spent 5 hours trying to save a page and the pages linked from that page. You can play around with depth and filters (God knows what "Each following line is a full URL (with chars following a “#” or space stripped) or a regular expression (e.g. “/^http://example\.com//”). " in the options is supposed to mean,). This is by far the most frustrating, and time wasting Chrome extension that I have ever installed. It simply does not work! Lastly, I tried both the Chrome and Firefox versions and only ever end up with the orginal page being saved i.e. no subpages.
• (2021-03-15) Clement Maloney: I am sorry to have to give this promising extension 1 star, however I have spent 5 hours trying to save a page and the pages linked from that page. You can play around with depth and filters (God knows what "Each following line is a full URL (with chars following a “#” or space stripped) or a regular expression (e.g. “/^http://example\.com//”). " in the options is supposed to mean,). This is by far the most frustrating, and time wasting Chrome extension that I have ever installed. It simply does not work! Lastly, I tried both the Chrome and Firefox versions and only ever end up with the orginal page being saved i.e. no subpages.
• (2021-02-22) Алексей: Страницы вроде как сохраняет, но ссылка приложения view captured pages не активна, от чего нет возможности посмотреть список сохраненных страниц
• (2021-01-23) Дмитро Доденко: При сохранении вкладки требует подтверждения для каждого файла. А если их сотни..
• (2020-11-10) Reng: Worked perfectly with my old scrapbook files, thank you!! Can import and handle thousands of entries with no problem. The search function is infinitely better than the old scrapbook. Once again thank you so much for this extension.
• (2020-11-10) Reng: Worked perfectly with my old scrapbook files, thank you!! Can import and handle thousands of entries with no problem. The search function is infinitely better than the old scrapbook. Once again thank you so much for this extension.
• (2020-11-07) 叭噗バプ: 擷取的時候，要手動，一個一個儲存檔案 非常麻煩 要如何設定
• (2020-10-16) yun kong: 太厉害了！
• (2020-10-07) Clarence Domesticus: This is my first experience using any such scrapbook extension & setting up the backend server (PyWebScrapBook, as noted in the extension overview). Overall, I'm very satisfied. It does fail on some sites, but after spending some time tweaking the settings I've been able to use it successfully on most sites I've needed it for. There are plenty of options & features, definitely more than enough to handle nearly any task for which I've needed this extension. I like that it's an ongoing project that's still being updated regularly. I see there are a number of negative reviews from individuals who are upset that this doesn't work like some other scrapbooks they've used in the past (EVEN SOME IN ALL CAPS). This seems to be a common thing reviewers like to do. In my opinion these comparisons are somewhat of an unfair basis for 1-star & 2-star ratings. If there are other options that some users enjoy using more, they should use those extensions/scrapbooks instead. I think it would be absurd, for example, if were to go out of my way to purchase a pack of markers specifically by BrandX and then left negative reviews because they're not BrandY, rather than evaluating BrandX based on its own qualities. Some 1-star reviews are clearly written by users who couldn't bother to follow basic configuration instructions or even take a simple look around the menus/folders. I wish ppl would stop doing this s*** not just here but in all their reviews. I just checked github, and it looks like are commits from as recently as 3 hours ago; like I said, this is an ongoing project, and I'm excited to see where the contributors take it. My only criticism as of right now is that, after updating my chrome, firefox, and edge extensions, and updating to the newest server version, chrome extension v 78.2 (the most recent version available in the store) is giving error 'Server app requires extension version >= 0.79.0'. But the FF extension is working perfectly fine. Again, I'm seeing github activity as recently as today, so anticipate that this will be resolved very soon.
• (2020-10-07) Clarence Domesticus: This is my first experience using any such scrapbook extension & setting up the backend server (PyWebScrapBook, as noted in the extension overview). Overall, I'm very satisfied. It does fail on some sites, but after spending some time tweaking the settings I've been able to use it successfully on most sites I've needed it for. There are plenty of options & features, definitely more than enough to handle nearly any task for which I've needed this extension. I like that it's an ongoing project that's still being updated regularly. I see there are a number of negative reviews from individuals who are upset that this doesn't work like some other scrapbooks they've used in the past (EVEN SOME IN ALL CAPS). This seems to be a common thing reviewers like to do. In my opinion these comparisons are somewhat of an unfair basis for 1-star & 2-star ratings. If there are other options that some users enjoy using more, they should use those extensions/scrapbooks instead. I think it would be absurd, for example, if were to go out of my way to purchase a pack of markers specifically by BrandX and then left negative reviews because they're not BrandY, rather than evaluating BrandX based on its own qualities. Some 1-star reviews are clearly written by users who couldn't bother to follow basic configuration instructions or even take a simple look around the menus/folders. I wish ppl would stop doing this s*** not just here but in all their reviews. I just checked github, and it looks like are commits from as recently as 3 hours ago; like I said, this is an ongoing project, and I'm excited to see where the contributors take it. My only criticism as of right now is that, after updating my chrome, firefox, and edge extensions, and updating to the newest server version, chrome extension v 78.2 (the most recent version available in the store) is giving error 'Server app requires extension version >= 0.79.0'. But the FF extension is working perfectly fine. Again, I'm seeing github activity as recently as today, so anticipate that this will be resolved very soon.
• (2020-09-05) פרטי: לא עובד בכלל
• (2020-08-23) David Morales Molina: Muy mala no cumplio su proposito
• (2020-08-05) arshdeep singh gill: Works flawlessly for me
• (2020-08-05) arshdeep singh gill: Works flawlessly for me
• (2020-07-06) Kang Chen: 非常好用的插件
• (2020-04-09) Mehdi Deilami: Seems like the extension doesn't use the cache and re-grabs the resources which is kind of inefficient
• (2020-04-09) Mehdi Deilami: Seems like the extension doesn't use the cache and re-grabs the resources which is kind of inefficient
• (2020-04-06) N. Fariba: Not working. I set Address: http://localhost:8080/ but ger error: Backend initilization error: Unable to connect to backend server.
• (2020-04-06) N. Fariba: Not working. I set Address: http://localhost:8080/ but ger error: Backend initilization error: Unable to connect to backend server.
• (2019-12-27) Jiahuang Zhang: 对于本地的html文件，可以编辑再保存，格式完美还原，简直html做笔记神器
• (2019-12-20) 00 “‪啊啊啊‬” 啊啊啊: 我试用了各种保存网页的插件，包括各种云笔记的剪藏工具，这个几乎是唯一能有效把微信公众号保存成html的。。作者加油。。
• (2019-10-27) 謝昀佑: 能夠直接擷取url嗎 擷取所有分頁雖然好用 但是我要開的分頁多到當機 希望加上這個功能
• (2019-09-08) Funny Domination: I love it! It has many useful options
• (2019-08-29) I K: It saves the pages faithfully
• (2019-08-27) Harris121 Channel: NOT THE SAME AS ORIGINAL SCRAPBOOK AT ALL. THE ONLY THING THAT IS THE SAME IS THE FRIGGIN' ICON! CONFUSING, POPUP BOXES, NO WAY TO "VIEW" THE SCRAPBOOK, NOTHING. I'VE TRIED TO FIGURE THIS OUT FOR THREE HOURS....WHERE ARE THE SAVED PAGES?...GEEZ. NO MARKUPS, HIGHLIGHTING, NOTHING....THIS IS (NOT) THE ORIGINAL FIREFOX EXTENSION....NOT EVEN A "CLOSE" COPY OF IT. (EXCEPT THE FRIGGIN' ICON). SAD. ****IF ANYONE KNOWS OF A GREAT ALTERNATIVE TO THE ORIGINAL FF SCRAPBOOK...PLZ POST!!!!! THANKS!
• (2019-08-02) Arcadiy Tpr: Saves pages nicely. Has a lot of features. I highly recommend it for a reliable offline websites archive.
• (2019-07-19) Dima: Great extension! Please continue development.
• (2019-06-29) Dmitry Kislitsyn: This extension works great! There are still some sites that it fails on, but very few and this is work in progress (check out developer's github), so the extension gets better! Excellent job and keep it up please!