CRX id
jmnpibhfpmpfjhhkmpadlbgjnbhpjgnd
jmnpibhfpmpfjhhkmpadlbgjnbhpjgnd
Description from extension meta
Protect against online threats in real-time using multiple browser protection engines.
Image from store
Description from store
Osprey: 브라우저 보호 확장 프로그램은 피싱 및 악성 웹사이트로부터 사용자의 브라우징을 안전하게 지켜주기 위해 설계되었습니다. 업계 선도적인 위협 인텔리전스 제공업체의 고급 보호 서비스를 활용하여, Osprey는 사용자가 방문하는 모든 URL을 점검해 악성 코드, 피싱, 사기 및 기타 온라인 위협을 탐지하고 차단합니다. 사용자 맞춤 설정을 통해 필요에 맞게 확장 프로그램을 조정하고, 위협으로부터의 보호를 보장하며, 성인 콘텐츠를 필터링할 수도 있습니다.
주요 기능:
- 다양한 온라인 위협에 대한 다층 보호
- 신뢰할 수 있는 보안 제공업체와 함께하는 실시간 점검
- 안전하지 않은 웹사이트 경고 및 차단된 콘텐츠 알림
- 개인정보 존중: 데이터 수집이나 추적 없음
사용자의 보안은 중요하며, Osprey는 모든 브라우징 세션에서 안심할 수 있도록 합니다.
Latest reviews
- (2025-08-01) mini moon: please add scam minder, scam adviser, gridinsoft, & fortiguard.. thanks..
- (2025-06-11) Squishy: Never get phished again. Period. I added this to my grandmas computer.
- (2025-04-24) Николай Кацыгин: Interesting extension.
- (2025-04-15) Len Fox: Because this extension only passes the minimum information to the engine it uses to check the URL your are visiting, it provides better privacy than using browser extensions of the listed engines separately (using their own browsing extension). Upside of this extension that the delay is minimal (strangely it scored better in performance tests than for instance Bitdefender Traffic light), so besides offering broader protection and better privacy it also provides great performance. NOTE: (for what it is worth): I like a "less is more" approach. Because Valkyrie and TotalAV did not do much and Emsisoft and GDATA both use Bitdefender with their own engines, therefor I opted for Microsoft Smartscreen, Norton and Bitdefender. EDIT: after the update to version 1.07, I noticed that the newly added Symantec Browser Protection blocked 70%, Bitdefender 25% and Norton 5% when enabling all engines. This is partly explained by the sequence in which the API's are called (same order as the extension's enable/disable popup). When taking a look in the browser console, I also noticed a pattern in "safe website" results in which Symantec, Bitdefender and Norton usually responded within 10 millisecs and Microsoft and Emsisoft usually took over 200 ms to respond and Total and Gdata showed mixed results (sometimes <10 and sometimes > 200ms). UPDATE (for what it is worth): I now have enabled only Symantec, Bitdefender and Norton webprotections for best balance between detection and fastest 'safe website' results. Thanks for this great all-in-one webprotection extension!
- (2025-02-11) Bayu 10: i think it will be much more better if you would like to add : 1) mcafee web advisor & malwarebytes browser guard engines 2) low trust from total webshield because your total webshield only based on malicious database please consider to add the features.. thank you..
- (2024-10-29) Abby L: This extension is wonderful!! I can have peace of mind knowing it keeps mine and my family's browsing safe and secure without slowing down any loading times. Thank you Osprey!