extension ExtPose

EXIF Viewer Pro

CRX id

mmbhfeiddhndihdjeganjggkmjapkffm-

Description from extension meta

Quick access to EXIF data of any image you view

Image from store EXIF Viewer Pro
Description from store Quick access to EXIF data of any image you view in Google Chrome Just right-click on any image on the web contains EXIF data and you will see the dialog with EXIF properties of related image

Latest reviews

  • (2023-08-30) Łukasz: nie warto, podsłuchują uzytkownikow poza tym bardzo mało parametrów zdjecia/obrazu rozszerzenie pokazuje
  • (2023-08-09) David Gessel: It injects google analytics code that includes the full URL of the page visited. What the motivation of the developer is to track every user's every page visited is, whether nefarious or curiosity or just data aggregation is pure speculation, but the call: https://ssl.google-analytics.com/__utm.gif?utmwv=5.7.2&utms=21&utmn=1846634066&utmhn=gessel.blackrosetech.com&utmt=event&utme=5(Bk101ExifAndrey243*NotifUI*msgForNotifsURLs%20is%20EMPTY)&utmcs=UTF-8&utmsr=1548x1313&utmvp=1530x1309&utmsc=24-bit&utmul=en-us&utmje=0&utmfl=-&utmdt=The%20end%20of%20a%20comic%20era%20%7C%20Gessel%20On...&utmhid=598185377&utmr=0&utmp=%2F2023%2F05%2F14%2Fthe-end-of-a-comic-era&utmht=1691540875437&utmac=UA-68817852-1&utmcc=__utma%3D114624785.1112307919.1687648025.1691523257.1691538355.74%3B%2B__utmz%3D114624785.1691437656.70.4.utmcsr%3Dgithub.com%7Cutmccn%3D(referral)%7Cutmcmd%3Dreferral%7Cutmcct%3D%2F%3B&utmjid=&utmu=4AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAE~ that's crystal clear. There's no way to disable this data collection. The privacy page does mention this: Do we use Google Analytics? Our extension, apps or services may use Google Analytics to track basic events like usage of features, catch errors, and improve the quality proactively. For instance, we track service's events like REQUESTED, SUCCESS or FAILED to make monitor the service quality and usage to fix issues proactively. ... "may" ... (does) "requested" means every page you visit with the plugin active. This is unlikely to be acceptable to many users.
  • (2023-02-03) Pantel Ain: Δεν δουλευει σε μένα
  • (2023-01-06) Nicolas Bellot: Globalement l'extension fonctionne bien, mais l'injection d'un script Google Analytics dans l'extension, qui permet un tracking détaillé sur chaque page consultée, m'a poussé à la désinstaller. Dommage d'être autant gourmand en information privée.
  • (2022-11-22) Tom B: DO NOT INSTALL They secretly added Google Analytics tracking that *tracks every page you visit*. Their "privacy policy" claims they do not do this. This is illegal under GDPR so any EU citizen using this Extension could file a complaint against them.
  • (2022-11-01) Percy (Percy): Tracks every site visit using Google Analytics!
  • (2022-10-14) Chris Richter: DOES NOT WORK! Other reviewers say the same exact thing. Maybe this worked at one point but it no longer works now. Very frustrating. I rarely write reviews but I wanted to warn anyone thinking about downloading and installing this to their chrome browser - don't do it. It's a complete waste of time. Sorry to burst your bubble but it doesn't work. I wrote this on 10/14/22. Thanks!
  • (2022-07-19) John Pravus: Doesn't seem to work, at all.
  • (2022-06-15) Adelaine (Sarah): Nutzlos, funktioniert überhaupt nicht. Hab es mit verschiedenen Webseiten und Dateien probiert, nichts passiert.
  • (2022-01-17) שי דרור: בחלק מהאתרים פועלת ובחלק לא
  • (2021-08-03) Cx Files: Has google analytics that tracks EVERY single page you visit. Reported.
  • (2021-07-29) Peter Klausener: Unter "Umgang mit Datenschutz" hat der Entwickler keinen Hinweis darauf hinterlegt, dass die Erweiterung automatisch einen Cookie zu Google Analytics setzt. Dieser Cookie kann m.W. auch nicht abgestellt werden. (Falls doch, bitte einen Hinweis oder eine Konfigurationseinstellung dazu). Die automatische Einblendung des Icons auf jedem Bild sollte man auch abstellen können. Funktional eine sehr gute Erweiterung.
  • (2021-04-12) Pivní Pupek: Nefunguje
  • (2021-04-07) Queen Anne's Revenge: Does not work and many of the 5 star reviews are obviously fake.
  • (2021-04-01) Tatiana Matantseva: Ничего эта прога не показывает.. потеряла время
  • (2021-03-10) Hao Peng (Personal): Very high cpu usage for no clear reasons. Disabled and CPU usage went down immediately. This does not always happen but I have no clue what would trigger high CPU usage. So I just turn it on when necessary, which is rare.
  • (2021-01-14) Max C: Отсылает статистику по посещенным страницам на www.google-analytics.com/__utm.gif для Bk101ExifAndrey243 Делает это отрытым текстом по http и дублирует по https. Если расширение включено на всех страницах - то отсылает все адреса.
  • (2021-01-03) Chris M: Be aware they add their own google analytics tracking to every single site you open so they're tracking everything you do.
  • (2020-12-27) たていす: this extension inserts Google Analytics in web page.
  • (2020-12-04) Alexey B: Лучшее предложение на сегодня, но в нем есть ошибка. Неверно интерпретируется кодировка в UTF-8.
  • (2020-03-23) Jasper Peters: Simply doesn't work. Clicking the toolbar icon: nothing happens. Using the context menu option: nothing happens. Straight up uninstall. Not worth the time to install!
  • (2019-11-03) T I: Didn't work at all.
  • (2019-09-13) Mihail Amurov: Очень полезное приложение, но при трех открытых фотографиях (со скрытым меню программы) потребляет почти 250-600 мегабайт ОЗУ. Это очень много.
  • (2019-08-16) Александр С.: Работает. Сожрал 4 гига оперативки. Удалил.
  • (2019-07-15) Alexander Doronsky: Иногда, ни с того ни с сего начинает дико жрать ресурсы процессора. Комп гудит как пылесос. С запущенным браузером даже страшновато стало оставлять. Пришлось удалить. Жаль, на эту тему не найти вменяемых расширений. Хоть сам пиши..
  • (2019-06-30) Дмитрий М.: This extension does not free the memory it takes when you open EXIF panel, even after you close it or close the tab. As a result, after just a few EXIF lookups, it consumes huge amounts of RAM. Don't use it.
  • (2019-06-13) Marra Paneza: AWESOME THANKS
  • (2019-03-15) This plugin exhausts my CPU in the background even when I'm not using it at all. Either there is a bug in the plugin or the plugin is mining crypto coins without consent.
  • (2019-03-12) Martin Petráček: EXIF informace ukazeuje super. Musel jsem doplněk ale z Chrome odebrat, protože hodně vytěžoval CPU i když jsem to nepožíval...
  • (2019-01-14) HRDTMS: Шляпа какая-то.
  • (2018-12-31) Kurz und schmerzlos: Funktioniert nicht!
  • (2018-11-24) Scott: This plugin does work in the sense that it shows EXIF data, along with histogram data. It does not show all EXIF data though...only specific fields, so some EXIF data is not shown. Would prefer to see all EXIF data, or at least the option for it. Unfortunately when it comes to security, it's pretty sloppy. It really needs a security audit to determine just how vulnerable, but in a few minutes I was able to find the following issues. I'll break down my rating like this: - Functionality: 4 - Interface: 3 - Security: 1 Total rating with weight on Security: 2 It sends and retrieves data to 9(!) different domains via insecure connections (http instead of https), with no disclosure in the plugin description. These are contacted either by XML HTTP Request (XHR) silently in the browser background without your knowledge, or they have an HTML link. (Most are by XHR.) When you don't use a secure internet connection - https (SSL/TLS) - any website/URL you visit could be a hacker imitating that site and stealing your data (auth cookies, private data, etc) - it's called a Man in the Middle Attack. Also, your data is not encrypted so it's flying around the internet in clear text and you increase your chance of getting hacked and leaking privacy info. Even if you think that the target domain will just redirect your link or XHR to a secure version of the URL, you would be wrong, because it could get intercepted before it even gets to the target site, and then redirected to any site, without your knowledge. In the plugin's code I found the following 9(!) domains accessed via http (insecure) connection instead of https (secure) connection. api.flickr.com cdn.sstatic.net code.google.com dl.comsoc.org maps.google.com ns.adobe.com stackoverflow.com tiny.cc www.google.com In addition, the following 8 domains are accessed via a secure connection (https): ajax.googleapis.com dl.dropboxusercontent.com dsnet.bitbucket.io gapps-61f4c.firebaseapp.com ssl.google-analytics.com www.dpreview.com www.google-analytics.com www.paypal.com That's 17 domains being accessed! That's a lot for one Chrome extension. There's also a lot of room for security issues when you're dealing with that many....it's just not necessary. URL shorteners in the code: tiny.cc In addition to not being a secure URL, this is an obscured link via a URL shortener...terrible security practice for an extension or plugin. The destination URL should be transparent. (At least the domain.) User data is being tracked by Google Analytics. I find that pretty offensive and refuse to use extensions that do this. I know devs/authors may be allowed to do this, but from a privacy point of view it's a terrible idea to use analytics software in an extension without any kind of notice, and without any opt-out capability!! Definitely not GDPR compliant! One last point on security: The plugin contains an image saying it's certified to not have malware, viruses, etc. I find that a little offensive considering just how poor its security is. Having an image like that can create a false sense of security for users. (It's actually what red-flagged me to look through the code, as it seemed odd.) Not ok. To be clear, this was not a security audit, just some quick notes. It needs a real security audit performed. However, I've seen enough issues to not use this plugin. I would recommend you not use it either until it gets a security overhaul.
  • (2018-11-01) Marc Kluijtmans: I messes up page loading in Flickr. Pretty annoying.
  • (2018-09-26) NABIL ABDULLA: Works good!
  • (2018-09-24) Александр Егоров: Почему расширение периодически вылетает? Появляется ошибка сбоя и просьба заново установить расширение. Иногда расширение работает, иногда нет. Из-за чего это происходит? Почему постоянно происходят сбои в работе расширения?
  • (2018-09-20) fletch b: Does nothing except take up disk space. Right clicking on images does nothing. Removed!
  • (2018-09-16) tg fdp: Ne fonctionne pas
  • (2018-09-03) Petr Semenenko: Отлично! Искал долго для новой Opera. Доволен!
  • (2018-04-10) Gersivan Oliveira: Infelizmente não funciona no Flickr.
  • (2018-03-21) Eeen85: Rubbish, flashes up info then goes straight to adverts.
  • (2018-01-05) Ole Hinz: Nice tool. Especially the possibility to view geo coordinates on google map is top.
  • (2018-01-03) Αndreas Lachanas: ΠΟΛΥ ΩΡΑΙΟ.
  • (2017-12-15) MOTO-ACE-VLOG: クロームにて使用しています。 右クリックで一発で様々な情報が表示されます。 しかもデフォで右カラムになって表示されるので、メイン画面に被らず表示される事も良いポイント。 データ表示も一瞬なのでストレスありません。
  • (2017-11-01) Melanie Lundy: Did not work for me.
  • (2017-10-03) Aleksey Nikitin: Ерунда. Не показывает огромное количество данных, которые есть!
  • (2017-09-15) Sergey Raskin: High CPU usage

Latest issues

  • (2023-08-14, v:2.4.3) Mustapha Tarkane: tyu
    àpmm
  • (2023-04-18, v:2.4.3) Samuel Tekrenius: Extension does NOT activate via shortcut
    When this extension is assigned to a keyboard shortcut, via "Manage Extensions > Keyboard Shortcuts > Exif viewer > Activate" -- what is supposed to happen? No matter which shortcut binding I try to assign, the extension DOES NOT open via the shortcut. Could this be fixed, so that we can open the extension via shortcuts, in addition to the "Chrome context-menu" ?
  • (2022-01-24, v:2.4.3) Julian Hallberg: Show Exif data doesn't exist
    Hi. Right click --> Show Exif data doesn't exist. How to fix this problem?
  • (2021-09-12, v:2.4.3) Andre Perreault: Stops working, then won't let me re-enable
    Hi. I never disabled it at all. So I looked up this page on Google again to see if it un-installed for some reason. No, it was still installed. But then had a thing at the top of the screen which said "This item has been disabled in Chrome. Enable this item". So I click to enable, but nothing happens. Google Chrome, and Windows 10 device. Again, it was working for a couple of days, and stopped for no reason. Any suggestions as to fix this problem would be appreciated. I would like to use it. Thanks
  • (2021-07-29, v:2.4.3) Peter Klausener: Konfiguration
    Hello, where can I disable the Google Analytics Cookie? where can I disable the icon on top of every image? Thank you
  • (2021-01-02, v:2.4.3) Associació Fotogràfica Ripoll: compartir imágenes con datos Exif
    hola necesito poder compartir imágenes con sus datos exif, desde una pagina web "WIX", como podría hacerlo? puede enviar un enlace a Drive por ejemplo o algo similar?
  • (2020-12-04, v:2.4.3) Alexey B: UTF-8
    The UTF-8 encoding in the description is misinterpreted.
  • (2019-08-16, v:2.4.1) Александр С.: Memory leak
    Memory leak.
  • (2018-11-24, v:2.4.1) Scott: Security Issues
    Basically, here's the content of my review, which explains it: This plugin does work in the sense that it shows EXIF data, along with histogram data. It does not show all EXIF data though...only specific fields, so some EXIF data is not shown. Would prefer to see all EXIF data, or at least the option for it. Unfortunately when it comes to security, it's pretty sloppy. It really needs a security audit to determine just how vulnerable, but in a few minutes I was able to find the following issues. I'll break down my rating like this: - Functionality: 4 - Interface: 3 - Security: 1 Total rating with weight on Security: 2 It sends and retrieves data to 9(!) different domains via insecure connections (http instead of https), with no disclosure in the plugin description. These are contacted either by XML HTTP Request (XHR) silently in the browser background without your knowledge, or they have an HTML link. (Most are by XHR.) When you don't use a secure internet connection - https (SSL/TLS) - any website/URL you visit could be a hacker imitating that site and stealing your data (auth cookies, private data, etc) - it's called a Man in the Middle Attack. Also, your data is not encrypted so it's flying around the internet in clear text and you increase your chance of getting hacked and leaking privacy info. Even if you think that the target domain will just redirect your link or XHR to a secure version of the URL, you would be wrong, because it could get intercepted before it even gets to the target site, and then redirected to any site, without your knowledge. In the plugin's code I found the following 9(!) domains accessed via http (insecure) connection instead of https (secure) connection. api.flickr.com cdn.sstatic.net code.google.com dl.comsoc.org maps.google.com ns.adobe.com stackoverflow.com tiny.cc www.google.com In addition, the following 8 domains are accessed via a secure connection (https): ajax.googleapis.com dl.dropboxusercontent.com dsnet.bitbucket.io gapps-61f4c.firebaseapp.com ssl.google-analytics.com www.dpreview.com www.google-analytics.com www.paypal.com That's 17 domains being accessed! That's a lot for one Chrome extension. There's also a lot of room for security issues when you're dealing with that many....it's just not necessary. URL shorteners in the code: tiny.cc In addition to not being a secure URL, this is an obscured link via a URL shortener...terrible security practice for an extension or plugin. The destination URL should be transparent. (At least the domain.) User data is being tracked by Google Analytics. I find that pretty offensive and refuse to use extensions that do this. I know devs/authors may be allowed to do this, but from a privacy point of view it's a terrible idea to use analytics software in an extension without any kind of notice, and without any opt-out capability!! Definitely not GDPR compliant! One last point on security: The plugin contains an image saying it's certified to not have malware, viruses, etc. I find that a little offensive considering just how poor its security is. Having an image like that can create a false sense of security for users. (It's actually what red-flagged me to look through the code, as it seemed odd.) Not ok. To be clear, this was not a security audit, just some quick notes. It needs a real security audit performed. However, I've seen enough issues to not use this plugin. I would recommend you not use it either until it gets a security overhaul.
  • (2018-10-20, v:2.4.1) Vincent van der Tuin: Doesn't work
    Nice idea, but it doesn't work. When I click the extension's button or the "Show EXIF data" menu option, nothing happens.
  • (2018-10-01, v:2.4.1) Daniel Pockett: not all exif showing
    Only Image Description and Credit showing up, despite me having boxes checked for a lot of other items. This is on all photos, even photos that have metadata included. Since Chrome updated, it doesn't seem to work like before. Any ideas?
  • (2018-04-03, v:2.4.1) Evan Pierce: Doesn't work?
    Why do I never see anything? Right-click and select "Show Exif Data", nothing. By nothing, I mean no right side bar appears, no information, no sign of life.
  • (2018-03-23, v:2.4.1) Kasey Smith: Bandwidth leak?
    Sometimes my limited internet connection will become completely saturated, checking in Chrome's task mananger I can see that this extension is the cause. Does EXIF viewer need to download the images separately from the browsing session to display the EXIF information, or is something weird going on here?
  • (2017-10-20, v:2.4.1) Miguel Ángel Pérez Arredondo: No funciona
    Windows 10 y no va la extension
  • (2017-08-18, v:2.4.1) Keith Weng: large images memory leak ?
    I used exif viewer to view a succession of very hires images from image.google.com (20, 40, 70, 100 megapixel images). There seemed to be some kind of cpu/memory craziness that completely hung my macbook pro (16GB RAM) until I managed to kill the tabs and exif viewer (took a couple minutes to close each tab). So seems exif viewer may have a problem when inspecting very high-res images.
  • (2017-07-25, v:2.4.1) Michael Tosen: Does not work in windows 10
    Right click on image, view exif data - nothing happens - not working - uninstall
  • (2017-07-14, v:2.4.1) Séverine Le Roy: ça ne fonctionne pas
    Quand je clique droit et clique sur "exif viewer" rien ne se passe. Pourquoi?
  • (2017-07-01, v:2.4.1) Gregg Tampa: garbage, doesn't work
    tried right clicking on the photo and down to exif viewer...does nothing...don't waste your time

Statistics

Installs
90,182 history
Category
Rating
3.3909 (463 votes)
Last update / version
2020-07-02 / 2.4.3
Listing languages
en el fr ru vi zh-TW

Links