extension ExtPose

Simple WebSocket Client

CRX id

pfdhoblngboilpfeibdedpjgfnlcodoo-

Description from extension meta

Construct custom Web Socket requests and handle responses to directly test your Web Socket services.

Image from store Simple WebSocket Client
Description from store Simple WebSocket Client is an extension for Google Chrome to help construct custom Web Socket requests and handle responses to directly test your Web Socket services. 1. Enter the URL for your Web Socket server. 2. Click Open. 3. Input request text, then click Send. 4. The extension show response messages.

Latest reviews

  • (2022-10-20) Michael Fletcher: I can test my websocket using swcat and it works fine but with this I get "undefined", useless. Flat out doesn't do the job. It's probably spyware.
  • (2022-08-06) Terence Lau: Very useful tool. Thanks to the author! A suggestion by the way: Hope to change the width of the URL input box to 90% instead of the current 225px. This makes it easier to modify the URL.
  • (2021-03-30) Heine Ken Millinge: Does not detect when server closes connection...
  • (2020-12-16) Carlos Fau: It connected but the text sent to the server was in a incorrect encoding. The text was encoded as two byte characters, the receiver buffer had zero bytes after each text byte. The reception of messages worked ok.
  • (2020-02-04) 시금치맨: very nice goooooooooooooood
  • (2019-12-04) Geraldo Eloi: Simples e útil. Deixa mais clara a situação da conexão e mantêm um histórico das conexões. Poderia ter uma interface menos arcaica.
  • (2019-09-26) 1) Text areas were poorly laid out and not usefully configured (e.g., no text wrapping, no ability to have multiple texts to send without awkward copy/paste) 2) Sometimes (around 10-20% of the time) when you click the Send button it shows up as sent (in red text below the button), but Wireshark would show that it hadn't sent a damned byte since the protocol upgrade. THIS WASTED A DAY for me, and will for you, too. Normally one has to TRY to make something worse than useless, but it looks like they succeeded.
  • (2019-08-18) Jason Hughes: Super helpful for testing server code.
  • (2019-07-06) Mohammad Gholami: Great and easy to use extension
  • (2019-05-29) Don Grasberger: Simple. Exactly what I was looking for.
  • (2019-03-14) Rıza Sabuncu: Birader cok güzel tool yazımşssın da biraz arayüze kas allah için ya, valla içim sıkılıyor daralıyorum abi
  • (2019-03-12) Eric Lin: Easy to use. Nice shot!
  • (2019-02-28) Works ok but not sure why devs insist on using tiny unsizable text boxes when there is plenty of real estate. A button to copy the log to clipboard would be useful.
  • (2019-01-09) Philipp Bergamin: Does what it should
  • (2018-11-10) Nick Spreen: No Cookie or other headers supported. Cannot be used for authentication.
  • (2018-11-06) Let my people go: Doesnt work properly.
  • (2018-08-17) Adam S: this saved me a load of time testing endpoints. very useful tool for testing local environments and production live site environements
  • (2018-05-14) alex basov: Клиент так себе. - Не обрабатывается ошибка подключение. Если соединение разорвано, то это не как не видно. - Очень маленькое поле для ввода URL. - Не хранит историю url и пакетов
  • (2018-04-07) Filip Shulevski: Does the Job!
  • (2018-01-18) Jose Monzon: Does not support Sec-WebSocket-Protocol header
  • (2017-03-24) Shenal Senarath: Gets the work done but need a better UI UX
  • (2017-03-15) John kariru: just works....
  • (2017-03-08) vbnetvbnet: Very nice!
  • (2017-01-27) Botino: It doesn't work !
  • (2017-01-04) I have 2 complaints: - Why does it need to know my browsing-history - I can't subscribe to any topic
  • (2016-12-05) Martin Ždila: I wasn't able to specify subprotocol.
  • (2016-11-14) Martin Spizman: Very basic yes, but very useful and dependable.
  • (2016-09-29) Sergey Balykov: Bad layout.
  • (2016-09-12) J dP: Text boxes are too small and the output text box has no horizontal scroll bar, or text wrapping. It also truncates data if its too large which is a pain. Would be much better if it could save history of requests.
  • (2016-08-01) Neil Kolban: Just what I needed. Would like the URL entry field to be wider.
  • (2016-07-04) 닉챠갈: 테헷
  • (2015-11-02) JCDenton Alex Melyon: Было бы неплохо если бы он восстанавливал данные полей и их размеры.

Statistics

Installs
100,000 history
Category
Rating
3.8866 (97 votes)
Last update / version
2014-09-13 / 0.1.3
Listing languages
en

Links